December 13, according to Arkham monitoring, two wallet addresses belonging to the same whale (9uuDsd and 9jnPPD) today during the early hours transferred a total of 2.299 billion PUMP tokens to FalconX, worth approximately $6.3 million. Historical data shows that this whale has been continuously accumulating PUMP tokens for over three months, but entered near the price peak, and then accumulated more during several market downturns. Now, if they sell these tokens, they may realize a loss of approximately $5 million.

December 13th, according to Decrypt, Florida prosecutors have seized around 1.5 million US dollars in cryptocurrency related to an overseas suspect (Chinese citizen Tu Weizhi). The wallet contained AVAX, DOGE, PEPE, and SOL. The State Attorney's Office's Economic Crimes Unit has obtained a court order to freeze assets held by Tu Weizhi. Tu Weizhi is currently charged with money laundering, grand theft, and organized fraud.Florida authorities stated that if Tu Weizhi attempts to enter the United States, he will be arrested. Investigators noted that this seizure action stemmed from an investigation. The investigation began in July 2024 when a resident of Orange County reported a loss of $47,421. The resident had wired the money to what appeared to be an online investment scheme. The investigation ultimately traced this funding to a wallet controlled by Tu Weizhi.

December 13th, according to Farside Investors monitoring, yesterday the US Solana spot ETF saw a net inflow of $2.5 million, including:VanEck VSOL: +$1.7 millionFidelity FSOL: +$0.8 million

December 13th. According to Farside Investors monitoring, yesterday the net inflow of the US Bitcoin spot ETF was $49.1 million, including:· BlackRock IBIT: +$51.1 million· Fidelity FBTC: -$2 millionIn addition, yesterday the net outflow of the US Ethereum spot ETF was $19.4 million, including:· BlackRock ETHA: +$23.2 million· Fidelity FETH: -$6.1 million· Grayscale ETHE: -$14.4 million· Grayscale Ethereum Trust: -$22.1 million

December 13: After the recent Polygon hard fork, some Polymarket users reported issues such as placing orders that could not be executed on-chain and withdrawal delays. Some users turned to Opinion to hedge risks, leading to a surge in Opinion's trading volume, surpassing $3 billion, exceeding that of Polymarket.

December 13, according to on-chain analyst Ai Auntie (@ai_9684xtpa), address 0x074…9B748 engaged in a phased bottom panic sell 11 hours ago, selling 3296 ETH (approximately $10.3 million) and liquidating their position for a final profit of $292,000. Prior to this, two days ago, they had unrealized gains of $1.266 million (entered the position on December 2 at $3029).

December 13th, according to Onchain Lens monitoring, a newly created wallet received 14,959 ETH from BitGo, worth approximately $48.42 million. The address is speculated to belong to BitMine.

December 13th, according to The Block, top credit rating agency Moody's is introducing a new framework for evaluating stablecoins that are increasingly integrated into the traditional financial system. The agency stated on Friday: "We will assess the credit risk of stablecoin's redemption obligation and assign a rating. We recommend starting by evaluating each eligible asset type in the stablecoin reserve pool and determining its credit quality through the rating of the assets and related counterparties."This framework means that, in practice, two stablecoins claiming to be pegged 1:1 to the US dollar may receive different ratings due to differences in their underlying reserve assets.Moody's further explained: "The second step in our analysis will consider market value factors, evaluating the market value risk of each type of eligible reserve asset based on asset type and maturity. The analysis will derive a haircut rate applicable to each asset value. We further recommend incorporating factors such as operational risk, liquidity risk, technical risk, etc., into stablecoin's risk assessment, ultimately reaching a rating conclusion."Moody's is now inviting market participants to provide feedback on the proposal by January 26, 2026.

December 13th, OKX posted on social media, stating that they have found conclusive evidence indicating that multiple associated and colluding accounts used a large amount of OM tokens as collateral, borrowed a huge amount of USDT, and artificially inflated the OM price.The OKX Risk Team promptly identified this abnormal activity, contacted the relevant account holders, and requested them to correct it, but they refused to cooperate. To control the risk, the platform took control measures on these associated accounts. Shortly thereafter, the OM price plummeted. OKX only liquidated a very small portion of the OM collateral, and the significant losses caused by the drastic price drop have been fully borne by the OKX Security Fund.Multiple third-party analyses have indicated that this price crash was mainly driven by perpetual contract trading activities on non-OKX trading platforms. The OKX Security Fund has operated entirely according to its design mechanism. As of now, the other party has not explained the source of the huge OM token holdings, nor why these groups hold and control such a large proportion of the token's supply.Currently, OKX has submitted complete evidence and documents to regulatory and law enforcement agencies, and multiple legal actions and judicial procedures are underway. At the same time, OKX condemns the MANTRA team for not only failing to respond to these severe and suspicious activities but also continuously ignoring facts and publicly accusing OKX.